How to Use the French Expression Nest-ce Pas

The French expression  nest-ce  pas (pronounced nes-pah) is what grammarians call a tag question. Its a word or short phrase that is tagged on to the end of a statement, to turn it into a yes-or-no question. It is a  question  added to a  declarative sentence to engage, verify, or confirm. Question tags use the auxiliary verb in the opposite form of the sentence itself. If a sentence is negative, the question tag takes the positive form of the auxiliary verb, and vice versa. Most of the time, nest-ce  pas is used in conversation when the speaker, who already expects a certain response, asks a question mainly as a rhetorical device. Literally translated,  nest-ce pas  means is it not, though most speakers understand it to mean isnt it? or arent you? In English, tag questions often consist of the specific verb from the statement combined with not. In French, the verb is irrelevant; the tag question is just nest-ce pas. English tag questions right? and no? are similar in usage to nest-ce pas, though not in register. They are informal, whereas nest-ce pas  is formal. The informal French tag question equivalent is non?   Heres a quick review of principle tenses, the auxiliary form they take, and an example of a positive and a negative question tag for each tense. Examples and Usage Vous à ªtes prà ªt, nest-ce pas? –  Youre ready, arent you?Elle est belle, nest-ce pas? –  Shes beautiful, isnt she?Nous devons partir bientà ´t, nest-ce pas? –  We have to leave soon, dont we?Il a fait ses devoirs, nest-ce pas? –  He did his homework, didnt he?Ils peuvent nous accompagner, nest-ce pas? –  They can come with us, cant they?

Comparing and Contrasting Qualitative and Quantitative...

INTRODUCTION Social research is conducted using a logical and systematic process that can be carried out for numerous reasons and it is concerned with the empirical study of social phenomena. The purpose of conducting such research is to enhance knowledge of how the social world operates through the study of human behaviour and investigates how humans interact with others in society. Research in general, is usually conducted by adopting either a qualitative or quantitative approach (Henn et al, 2006). The approaches taken and the decisions that are made by qualitative and quantitative researchers differ with respect to their epistemological position and ontological assumptions and these assumptions orientate the research strategies in a†¦show more content†¦The theoretical perspectives that are largely concerned with quantitative research includes; realism, critical inquiry, positivism and post-positivism (Gray, 2004). Qualitative researchers tend to view the world through the interpreti vist paradigm. The interpretivist researcher focuses on the interpretation of social phenomenon as subjective, aiming to discover a deep and meaningful understanding of how and why human behaviour evolves, and through the eyes and points of view of their participants, believing that knowledge is uncovered from meaning (Henn et al, 2006). In contrast, Quantitative researchers view the world through the positivist paradigm. The positivist researcher primarily focuses on the investigation of social phenomenon as objective by detaching themselves from the subject matter to view the world from an objectivist angle and believing that knowledge is ‘out there’ to be uncovered (Henn et al, 2006). Qualitative and quantitative research similarly has an established relationship between theory and research (Bryman, 2004) which underpins the differing perspectives of qualitative and quantitative research. Qualitative research is primarily inductive in approach and is described by Henn, et al (2006, p.14) as a â€Å"research-then-theory approach†, whereby the hypotheses and theory is generated from the data that is collected and analysed. Analysis of the collected data will indicate any potential relationships and patterns that emerge between variablesShow MoreRelatedComparing Quantitative and Qualitative Research1586 Words   |  7 PagesCOMPARING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH Social theory is a â€Å"system of interconnected ideas that condenses and organises the knowledge about the social world and explains how it works† (Neuman, 2006, p.8) and for many years scientists have gathered data using specialised techniques such as Quantative and Qualitative research to support or reject these theories. Quantitative research â€Å"generates numerical data or information that can be converted into numbers,† (Experiment Resources, 2009,Read MoreA Research On Computer System1035 Words   |  5 Pagesdeciding factor of what a research will unfold. Research is a process to discover new knowledge for either personal or professional to solve a problem. Unconsciously, most people are researchers most of the time with no define or formal process. I believe people do not necessarily think of themselves as researchers but research is about collecting information that tells us about something and helps to make informed decisions. As one go about their da ily routine, research done whether it is readingRead MoreQuantitative Qualitative Research Essays1552 Words   |  7 PagesIn this essay I will be comparing and contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative research methods, discussing the Epistemology, methodology, and the varying techniques each method uses. The essay will also take a brief look at the Ethical considerations of research using relevant psychology examples. Here, when considering the epistemology behind both research methods, we must see it in terms of our essential philosophy of ideas and concepts and the ways in which it can be shaped (Pidgeon amp; HenwoodRead MoreStrengths And Weaknesses Of Research Methodology Essay1562 Words   |  7 Pagesorder to conduct valuable social research, we need to balance the strengths and weaknesses of the methodologies available to us. We need to consider what is the question that we want to answer and how we want to answer it. What is our purpose and what methodology makes more sens e to achieve it. How do we justify using one method over the other? What is our reasoning behind it? These are some of the questions we have to answer before we start involving ourselves in research. They would help us chooseRead MorePositivism vs Interpretivism Essay1575 Words   |  7 Pagesunderpinning social research- This essay intends to investigate by comparing and contrasting positivist and interpretive perspectives that surround social research. It will look into the use of methods such as quantitative and qualitative research and the effects and outcomes that this has in relation to social research. This will include the variations amongst them in both a positive and negative light. Before research can be undertaken the researcher must investigate the various methodologies, methodsRead MoreResearch Design Of Faith Based Recovery Essay894 Words   |  4 Pages Research Design in Faith-Based Recovery Catherine A. DeLorco Ohio Christian University October 22, 2016 Research Design in Faith-Based Recovery To determine what type of research design I would use to answer my question relating to faith-based recovery, I will first need to explore the three major research designs with examples of appropriate uses. Additionally, I will present my research question with the research design I would choose and why. Qualitative research is the firstRead MoreSystems Intervention Strategy1659 Words   |  7 PagesSIS was developed by Mayon-White in the 1980s. Its purpose is to provide a cyclic structure for analysing business systems, but, unlike soft systems methodology, it is relatively quantitative (rather than qualitative). The strategy has three stages: diagnosis, design and implementation, each subdivided into several steps (see Mayon-White 1993: 136). Diagnosis There is a zero stage of entry, at which point it is acknowledged that change is required, and that the process may be complex. The firstRead MoreBenefits Of Long Term Confinement Essay1194 Words   |  5 Pages(Jackson Roberts, 1991, p. 559). The qualitative approach that Roberts and Jackson follow here is taking all variables into consideration. Qualitative research involves no ruling out variables and ensuring that they are all considered (Palys, 2014, p. 16). Evidently, Bonta and Gendreau do not employ this qualitative method as they do not deduce that it was imperative to incorporate this variable into their study. Roberts and Jackson also employ the qualitative approach of using verbal reports ratherRead MoreSample Size, Scale And Limitations1024 Words   |  5 PagesThe first research which is an empirical evaluation employs the process of evaluating an intervention. Therefore the focus is on the components of the SDP and evaluating the targeted outcomes of the program. In this study the progress of the targeted outcomes assessed in terms of tis its social security, food stamps and microcredit compo nents. Based on empirical evidence the study details the assess of its components namely youth employment, provision of food stamps, provision of social insuranceRead MoreIntroduction. As Management Is Concerned About Gaining1056 Words   |  5 Pagesbusiness and management research is therefore derived from social science disciplines embedded in sociology, psychology, anthology and economics (Bryman Bell, 2015). Also, management research can be regarded as applied research. According to Bryman and Bell (2015), it helps readers with choosing between solutions and carrying out practices. To carry out management research, methods which refers to specific techniques for collecting and analysing data and particularly methodology which means the reason

Earth and Yuri Gagarin Free Essays

In my presentation I will tell you about the first cosmonaut. The purpose of this presentation to know more about the life of Yuri Gagarin and his exploits. Also explains how Gagarin prepared to fly into space, the process of this important event and what happened with the first cosmonaut after he made his flight. We will write a custom essay sample on Earth and Yuri Gagarin or any similar topic only for you Order Now And in the presentation contains different photos of Gagarin with his family and friends. Career in the Soviet space program It was on the 12th of April, 1961, when the first flight by man into cosmic space took place. Yuri Gagarin, the first cosmonaut in the world, he was a 27 years old Air Force pilot at that time. The space ship flew at the speed of 300 miles a minute. That’s six times faster than man ever travelled before. His flight lasted 108 minutes, but a circuit round the Earth took 89 minutes. It was a brilliant achievement on the part of our scientists and technologists, and on the part of Gagarin who risked his life to achieve a victory for his country. This is what Yuri Gagarin said at this press conference: â€Å"On my flight around the Earth was clearly seen: the continents, island and seas. Flying over the land I could clearly see the big squares of fields and it was possible to distinguish which was meadow and which was forest I could not see as well as from an airplane. I saw for the first time with my own eyes the Earth’s shape. I must say that the view of the horizon is very beautiful. You can see the noticeable change from the light surface of the Earth in to completely black sky in which you can see the stars. It is very gradual and lovely. In space the shines ten times more brightly than on the Earth. The stars can be seen very well. I felt excellent as I entered space. Everything was easier to do when weightlessness . My legs and arms weighed nothing. Objects swam in the cabin. During this state of weightlessness I ate and drank and everything was the same as on the Earth. The passage back from weightlessness to the force of gravity happened smoothly. Arms and legs feel the same as during weightlessness, but now they have weight. When I returned to the Earth I was full of joy. † Death and legacy After the flight Gagarin became a worldwide celebrity. He went around the globe with press conference and everywhere people were impressed by his charming smile, inelegance and simplicity. In 1962, he began serving as a deputy to the Supreme Soviet. Unfortunately, he tragically died during a training flight on an airplane. But he is remembered throughout Russia forever. American astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin left one of Gagarin’s medals on the moon as a tribute. Moreover in Russia there are a lot of streets, squares, schools and colleges bear his name. How to cite Earth and Yuri Gagarin, Papers

CSL Versus Macquarie Group

Question: Discuss about the CSL Versus Macquarie Group. Answer: Introduction In this report, the researcher analyses and compares the two companies. CSL is an Australian blood and serum product company where as MACQUARIE group is an investment banking group of Australia (Boyle, 2014). CSL is a bio therapeutics company that helps in developing and delivering innovative biotherapies in order to save lives of human beings (Tan, 2015). MACQUARIE group is one of the leading suppliers of financial and investment and funds. The various operations combined with effective central position have effectively helped the company in achieving profitability. The various operations combined with an effective central position have effectively helps the company in achieving profitability. The CSL Company is meeting its objectives by providing best services to the people. In this report, the researcher compares and contrasts the two companies with respect to their mission and vision, values, objectives, goals and corporate social responsibility of the organization. The stakehold ers of the two companies are also compared by the researcher. Vision and Mission Comparison and contrast between values and mission of CSL and MACQUARIE Group The main mission of MACQUARIE group is to realize the opportunity in order to provide benefits to its clients, stakeholders or staffs whereas the mission of the CSL is to develop and deliver innovative biotherapies in order to save lives of human beings. The main difference between the mission of CSL and MACQUARIE group is that, CSL saves lives of people by innovating biotherapies whereas the MACQUARIE group provides benefits to its clients by realizing opportunities. The visions of the two companies are also different. CSL works in order to fulfill the needs of the people by providing best services to the people who are suffering from life-threatening diseases. MACQUARIE Group on the other hand, operates effectively in order to meet the expectation of its staff and for developing its financial growth (Maitland, 2013). The vision of CSL includes customer focus, innovation, and commitment. The company is very much passionate about the service it provides to the customers. The company fulfills the needs of the people by addressing life-threatening diseases (Csl.com.au, 2016).It conducts various medical researchers in order to support patients and for spreading awareness about the educational program among people. The main dedication of the company is to research on the plasma protein that helps in maintaining a robust product pipeline. The vision of MACQUARIE Group is based on the principles of opportunity (Macquarie.com, 2016). The company operates with integrity within a strong and effective management framework. The long-term principles used by the company are based on the expectation of its staff. Values of the organizations Comparison and contrast on the values of CSL and MACQUARIE Group The main aspiration of MACQUARIE Group is to be a pre-eminent supplier of financial services (Maitland, 2013). The culture of the company is presented by the way they work and act together. The values of the company include integrity, commitment of the client, teamwork, fulfillment the needs of the people, striving towards profitability and highest standards. On the other hand, values of CSL create and set a foundation in order to work across the organization (Charlton et al., 2014). The company serves as a tool in the decision making purpose. The values of CSL include focus on the customers, integrity, innovation, collaboration and superior performance. The company is very much passionate about meeting the needs of the customers. The company always tries to provide the best service to the peoples. The values of both the company diversifies. The main values of MACQUARIE Group are to fulfill the needs of the people by achieving efficient profitability and standards whereas the CSL Company provides efficient service to its customers and the service provided by the company must be of superior quality (McCluskie et al., 2013). The company provides service to the people against life- threatening diseases irrespective of the profit gained by it. Objectives and Goals of the organizations Comparison and contrast between objectives and goals of CSL and MACQUARIE Group The objectives and goals of CSL are effective and are based on the SMART model. The SMART model of CSL include: Specific: The main objective of CSL is to develop and deliver innovative biotherapies in order to save lives of human beings. The company is very much passionate about the service it provides to its customers (Danhof, 2013). The company mainly focuses on the service in order to save lives of the people from life-threatening diseases. Measurable: The Company is meeting its objectives by providing best services to the people. In the year 2015, the company saves life of millions of people as influenza vaccine joined forces to create Seqirus (Behring, 2013). The company became leading manufacturer of US$24 billion of plasma industry. Attainable: The objectives set by the organization are attainable, and the company is achieving it by providing excellent service to its customers. Relevant: The Company has various resources in order to achieve the objectives. The resources of the company include vaccine, pharmaceuticals, plasma products that help in saving the lives of millions of people around the world (Fokkink et al., 2015). With the help of its resources, the company became the best service provider. Figure 1: SMART objectives of CSL (Source: Fokkink et al., 2015, pp.56). Time Bound: The company wants achieves its objectives when the people are struggling because of the life threating diseases. The company provides the best service in order to rescue the life of people (Hep, 2016). CSL achieves its objectives when people are in need. On the other hand, MACQUARIE Group is effectively using the SMART model in order to achieve their objectives and goals. Specific: The main objective of MACQUARIE group is to realize the opportunity in order to provide benefits to its clients, stakeholders or staffs (Kim et al., 2015)MACQUARIE Group operates properly in order to meet the expectation of its staff and for developing its financial growth. Measurable: The Company is meeting its goals and objectives by providing financial help to stakeholders, clients, etc. (Aulich, 2014). In the year 2015, the company provided 34 million dollar help to different organization of Australia in order to promote their business. Figure 2: SMART objectives of MACQUARIE (Source: Danhof, 2013, pp.67). Attainable: The objective of MACQUARIE Group is attainable as the investment group is assisting help to different stakeholders and clients of Australia. Relevant: MACQUARIE group has sufficient revenue which is used by the company as resources in order to provide financial help to different people, clients, and stakeholders. The company provides the best service in order to help people financially (Lewis, 2013). CSL achieves its objectives when people are in need. Time Bound: The Company achieves its objectives when people need financial help from the investment bank. Corporate Social Responsibility Comparison and contrast between corporate social responsibility of CSL and MACQUARIE Group The corporate social responsibility of CSR is to conduct business ethically and to contribute the social, environmental well-being of the communities. The corporate responsibility of the company includes: Developing and researching: The Company develops and improves the protein-based therapies in order to save the lives of the patients (Danhof, 2013). The therapies are of standard quality: the company maintains the quality of therapies at all stages of the product cycle in order to provide safe therapies to people. Positive Work Environment: CSL provides a positive environment for work by ensuring the safety of its employees (Behring, 2013). On the other hand, the corporate social responsibility of MACQUARIE Group includes: Financing: The Company encourages advisors to think innovatively in order to address different challenges of client and for creating new opportunities (Aulich, 2014). Asset Finance: The Company provides financial help globally, and helps is solving management, which is the main aim of the company. Capital Market and Advisory: It includes corporate finance, equity, and capital market debt and principle investment (Fokkink et al., 2015). Research: The research market of the company is on the forefront. They cover the whole world in order to insights into the issues and trends that help in driving companies and industries. Both the companies have different corporate social responsibility. MACQUARIE uses financial values that encourage the advisors to think innovatively in order to address different challenges of the client and for creating new opportunities whereas CSL develops and improves the protein-based therapies in order to save the lives of the patients (McCluskieet al., 2013). The company maintains the quality of therapies in all stages of the product cycle in order to provide safe therapies to people. Stakeholders Comparison and contrast between stakeholders of CSL and MACQUARIE Group The stakeholders of MACQUARIE group are responsible for managing the company. The objectives of the company can be achieved or affected by the stakeholders. The main aim of the stakeholders is to help people financially by increasing the growth of the company whereas the stakeholders of CSL took proper steps in helping people. They cover various operations including education for health services, information, support of patient, etc. (Lewis, 2013). The company uses different strategies in order to engage the stakeholders. The approaches used by them include meetings, surveys, visit to major suppliers, etc. Both companies namely CSL and MACQUARIE have different stakeholders as mentioned in the corporate statement. The stakeholders of CSL use different operations including education for health services and information in order to help the patient (Maitland, 2013).The MACQUARIE Group financially helps the people by spreading awareness about its investing approaches.The stakeholders help in conducting various medical researchers in order to support patients and for spreading awareness about the educational program among people. The main dedication of CSL is to research on the plasma protein that helps in maintaining a robust product pipeline. The stakeholder of MACQUARIE Group ismainly reflects the principles of opportunity (Joshi et al., 2013). The company operates with integrity within a strong and effective management framework. Conclusion It is concluded that both the companies of different organizational goals as per the SMART objectives. The CSL focuses on several approaches, which include customer focus, innovation, and commitment. The company is very much passionate about the service it provides to the customers. The MACQUARIE Group is based on the principles of opportunity. The company operates with integrity within strong and effective management framework.The values of both the company are different. The MACQUARIE Group fulfill the needs of the people by achieving efficient profitability and standards whereas The CSL Company provides efficient service to its customers and the service provided by the company must be of superior quality. The researcher observed that the objectives and goals of CSL and MACQUARIE Group are effective, as per the SMART model. The various operations combined with effective central position have effectively helps the company in achieving profitability. The CSL Company is meeting its ob jectives by providing best services to the people.The MACQUARIE have sufficient amount of money, which is used by the company as resources in order to provide financial help. In the year 2015, the company saves life of millions of people as influenza vaccine joined forces to create Seqirus. The company became leading manufacturer of US$24 billion of plasma industry as analyzed by the researcher. References Aulich, C., 2014. Airport Privatisation in Australia: A Tale of Three Cities.Applied Finance and Accounting,1(1), pp.1-11. Behring, C.S.L., 2013. 32 Grifols. Boyle, P., 2014. Australia's biggest investment bank in cluster bomb'hall of shame'.Green Left Weekly, (1035), p.3. Charlton, K., Donald, S., Ormiston, J. and Seymour, R., 2014. Impact Investments: Perspectives for Australian charitable trusts and foundations. Csl.com.au. (2016).CSL Ltd is a leader in plasma protein biotherapeutics. [online] Available at: https://www.csl.com.au/about [Accessed 2 Aug. 2016]. Danhof, M., 2013, August. Lecture 4: Pharmacology. InWORKSHOPS FR FEBRUAR JULI 2014(p. 5). Fokkink, W.J.R., Falck, D., Santbergen, T.C., Huizinga, R., Wuhrer, M. and Jacobs, B.C., 2015.Comparison of Fc N-Glycosylation of Pharmaceutical Products of Intravenous Immunoglobulin G.PloS one,10(10), p.e0139828. Hep, C., 2016.Specialty Pharma Journal.Sat,6, p.11. Hyatt, D., 2014. CSL industry site tour.Equity,28(4), p.15. Joshi, M., Cahill, D., Sidhu, J. and Kansal, M., 2013. Intellectual capital and financial performance: an evaluation of the Australian financial sector.Journal of intellectual capital,14(2), pp.264-285. Kim, H.M., OConnor, K.B. and Han, S.S., 2015. The spatial characteristics of global property investment in Seoul: A case study of the office market.Progress in Planning,97, pp.1-42. Lewis, G., 2013. Australia's regulatory panopticon.AQ-Australian Quarterly,84(4), p.26. Macquarie.com. (2016).Macquarie Group. [online] Available at: https://www.macquarie.com/in/corporate [Accessed 2 Aug. 2016]. Maitland, I., 2013. CSL Australia PTY LTD v Formosa: Jurisdiction and Duty of Care.Austl. NZ Mar. LJ,27, p.18. McCluskie, M.J., Weeratna, R.D., Evans, D.M., Makinen, S., Drane, D. and Davis, H.L., 2013. CpG ODN and ISCOMATRIX adjuvant: a synergistic adjuvant combination inducing strong T-Cell IFN-responses.BioMed research international,2013. Tan, C.S.L., 2015, January. KeepCup: A young fast growth entrepreneurial company that disrupted the take away coffee cup industry. InUnited States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship.Conference Proceedings(p. QQ1).United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Whitton, C., Baker, D. and Mounter, S., 2016, February. Foreign ownership in Australian agribusiness: results of a survey of firms. In2016 Conference (60th), February 2-5, 2016, Canberra, Australia(No. 235412).Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society. Wilson, G., 2014. Money for nothing.Money,19(297).